Speaker Pelosi Takes A Pass On Rebutting Cooper On Liberadio(!)
Posted on February 5, 2009 at 1:07 pmOne half of the dynamic duo that exposed the open wound of Democratic politics by interviewing Jim Cooper shares her view of the still developing controversy.
permalink | Comment on this post
Up In Pelosi’s Grill
Posted on at 7:51 amThe Politico again reports that Liberadiogate just makes clear what role Rep. Jim Cooper will play in national politics for the next few years — Nancy Pelosi’s worst nightmare:
But whether he wants to talk about it or not, the radio incident thrusts Cooper into the very public role of burr in Pelosi’s saddle. Every party has its itches to scratch. Arizona Rep. Jeff Flake, a fiscal scold who crusades against earmarks, embarrassed GOP leaders over the years by highlighting projects they endorsed. North Carolina Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr. became the Republican voice against the war in Iraq. Sens. Tom Coburn and Jim DeMint, in their own way, cause grief for their leaders.
Cooper now joins the ranks — but in reality, he’s been there before.
He locked horns with Hillary Clinton over health care reform in 1992 and 1993, during his first 12-year stint in the House, and he has questioned the readiness of his party to handle governing with a Democratic president. Late last year, he broke from many of his fellow fiscal conservatives in the Blue Dog Caucus to back California Rep. Henry A. Waxman for chairman of the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee.
But that Blue Dog Caucus remains his base of power in the House. In a Wall Street Journal interview earlier this year, Cooper said that if he and his fellow Blue Dogs “were to ally with the Republicans, we could swing any vote in the House of Representatives” — a not-so-subtle threat to any party leader.
permalink | Comment on this post
Cooper’s Comments To Liberadio(!) Continue To Stir Stew
Posted on February 4, 2009 at 2:08 pmPolitico has the developing story of the fallout regarding the remarks made by Rep. Cooper concerning his vote against the House stimulus package:
“Mr. Cooper has clarified those remarks,” she said, motioning to an aide, who handed out copies of Cooper’s statements.
Privately, people close to Pelosi said they weren’t surprised he would take a swipe at her – but said they had received back-channel assurances from the White House that the substance of his remarks was untrue.
And a senior House leadership aide scoffed at Cooper’s claim, suggesting the congressman was merely grandstanding.
“The idea that he didn’t get information or was kept in dark is just not true,” said the aide. “We sent out reams of information. He spoke at one of the caucuses [about the bill].”
Fired back a source close to Cooper: “If he were grandstanding, he could probably pick a more appropriate venue than a small-audience local radio show.”
Cooper has made little secret of his lack of regard for Pelosi’s leadership and has earned the enmity of her loyalists for his propensity to speak candidly.
You gonna take that Mary and Freddie?
UPDATE: Mary Mancini reports that Obama’s spokesman has been asked at a press briefing about the comments.
Rep. Cooper Says You Didn’t Hear What You Heard
Posted on at 11:55 amDavidson County’s congressman denies what you can plainly hear him say in this Liberadio(!) interview, that Obama’s people, in a subtle, unofficial way, sanctioned his vote against the stimulus package in the House:
“At no point did any member of President Obama’s staff encourage me to vote against the House economic recovery bill. I told them I believed that the bill had too much long-term spending and didn’t meet the president’s goal of getting 75% of the money into the economy within 18 months. After the conversation, I felt encouraged that the administration understood those concerns and shared my longstanding commitment to fiscal responsibility.”
Compare that with this:
Well, I probably shouldn’t tell you this, but I actually got some quiet encouragement from the Obama folks for what I’m doing. They know its a messy bill and they wanted a clean bill.
Now, I got in terrible trouble with our leadership because they don’t care what’s in the bill, they just want it pass and they want it to be unanimous. They don’t mind the partisan fighting cause that’s what they are used to. In fact, they’re really good at it. And they’re a little bit worried about what a post-partisan future might look like.
If members actually had to read the bills and figure out whether they are any good or not. We’re just told how to vote. We’re treated like mushrooms most of the time.
SEE ALSO: Cooper continues damage control, belittles radio audience.
Pelosi Gets You White Working-Class Ethnic Catholics In Ohio?
Posted on May 22, 2008 at 1:02 pmThat’s what Tim Chavez seems to be saying and he doesn’t appear to be joking:
Obama is going to need a lot of help from a running mate in the general election. All the males being cited only help in one state and with one constituency. Pelosi appeals to Catholics, of which she is one, and that will make a difference in Pennsylvania and Ohio. And, of course, she is a woman. And they do most of the voting in every state in this country.
Pelosi can be more powerful as VP, particularly with foreign policy as her trips to Syria, Iraq and Tibet already have shown. She can also most effectively steer Obama’s legislative agenda through the Congress as Senate president with a vote on ties and with her long-time contacts in the House. I’m sure she is owed a lot of favors.
Recent Comments
He that is without a typo, cast the...
Wow. Stay classy, guys.
you know commission is supposed to have 2...
Haslams donations to other politicians ..on this one it list him as The...
Washington Wamp...
Go Ramsey....
Ive been watching from afar but feel compelled to comment. I actually...
I dont have time to read “The Millionair Next Door”. I...
Who cares about this chubby’s dreams?...
hey, wait, this sounds...