Baby Daddy Drama: Campfield Spars With Another Colleague Over Paternity Bill
Posted on March 16, 2009 at 2:22 pmAs was reported by Tom Humphrey over the weekend, Rep. Stacey Campfield has once again ignited some fireworks in a state legislative committee on Wednesday of last week.
Just like last year’s famous standoff with Rep. Rob Briley, at issue was Campfield’s bill, HB 805, dubbed the “Baby Daddy Bill” which would allow a mechanism for paternity be disestablished in the event that a conclusive DNA test proves a previously assumed parent is not the biological father.
Rep. Jeanne Richardson raises some concerns about the bill and whether legislation is necessary. Richardson seems to be saying that the bill makes her uncomfortable because it presupposes some mass distrust of women and that there simply aren’t that many cases women deliberately attempting to defraud the men in their lives about offspring to justify codification in law.
Aunt B. somewhat similarly delves into the psychology that could be behind this legislation engaging in speculation about Campfield’s past interactions with women.
My question about all this is: so what?
Let’s say Rep. Stacey Campfield is as demented as Aunt B. projects that he is. Let’s say further that we concede that a very large majority of women are not attempting to defraud men who they have slept with and that most cases of inaccurate paternity are honest mistakes by virtuous women. Lets also concede that most all these cases are very rare exceptions from the norm.
So what?
The question at hand is: should a man be forced to pay for a child not of his line once that fact has been determined? If the answer is no then should not the law afford these men the protect they deserve regardless of the rarity of these instances and morally upstanding nature the women involved?
If the legislation would do nothing objectively “wrong” then what does the motivation for filing such legislation have to do with anything? The legislation is either just or unjust, right or wrong?
Right?
Gone, Baby, Gone: Briley Sends Campfield Paternity Bill To Summer Study
Posted on April 21, 2008 at 8:10 amRep. Rob Briley plays Detective Bressant to Rep. Campfield’s Casey Affleck during discussion over a bill which would allow fathers to petition to the court to disestablish paternity after DNA evidence reveals a baby was not sired by the man on the birth certificate:
“I think this is the most anti-child piece of legislation I’ve seen down here in 10 years - by far,” said Briley.
“Do you believe in premartial sex?” Briley asked Campfield.
“I don’t see what that has to do with this (legislation),” replied Campfield.
With little variation, Briley repeated his question and Campfield his answer. Briley also asked Campfield if “you see adultery as wrong?”
“You’re talking about children that are the result of premartial sex or adultery,” Briley said.
“No. I don’t think that children should be involved in premartial sex,” said Campfield. He also expressed disapproval of adultery.
“Yet you want to punish a child as the result of an adulterous situation,” said Briley. “You put the child in the position of bearing the burden of a parent’s conduct.”
“Children never have to pay the child support,” said Campfield.





Recent Comments
Gordan and Tanner are no votes at this point. These...
The point is that we should have gotten rid of employer-based...
LOL … I love...
Mark, The problem is, when insurance companies screw someone out...
Have you considered that by allowing people and businesses to...
I am in favor of health care reform that eliminates abuses like...
The prodigal son...
Has he said he will...
Goldni, My apologies. Your second comment posted when I responded...
GoldnI - Comments with more than one link included have to be...