Senator Henry Will Not Retire
Posted on July 28, 2008 at 6:31 amDru Fuller reports that Senator Doug Henry intends to seek a 19th term in the state Senate:
Veteran State Sen. Doug Henry announced at the Davidson County Democratic Women’s annual picnic that he is running for re-election in two years. The 18-term senator has already begun raising money for his race for a 19th term. Henry has served 36 years in the Senate and two in the House.
Henry handily defeated Republican challenger and blogger Bob Krumm to secure his 18th term in 2006.
Putting The Personal, The Politics and the Partisanship Over Principle And Previous Votes
Posted on May 27, 2008 at 5:36 pmClint Brewer today attempts to make the case that Senator John Wilder’s failure to extend the Tennessee plan for judicial selection was not a case of partisan politics, as Wilder himself asserted upon his defeat on the Senate floor, but instead was simply a case of senators following a tradition laid out by Senator Wilder of respecting the committee system.
In trying to bypass the committee system and bring the bill straight to the floor it was Wilder, Brewer suggests, who violated the status of the Senate being the Senate.
Regardless of what you think of the Tennessee Plan or Wilder, anyone who watched this video had to be struck by the sadness of the display. Here was, in essence, a Tennessee political icon, asking former allies who had stood with him before to stand with him again.
Was it partisanship that led the Republican coalition to stand with their new Speaker in insuring that the Tennessee Plan, as presently configured, would die or was it just politics.
When Wilder had power, he was the one, he was the dealmaker, he could get members to break way from their party caucuses and join him. That was because he had power and a political future.
It was not party, principle or a spirit of bipartisanship that led folks to follow Wilder before. Wilder held the gavel. He was the shotcaller. He may have been a benevolent dictator in the past but the point was he was no kind of dictator at all anymore.
He was asking these Republicans to go against their Speaker, the future of their party, out of personal loyalty. His central argument was not for the Plan, but for him. Sure, he articulated a defense but the speech was designed not to be persuasive on the merits of the plan. It was an opportunity for Wilder to drop names, Woodsen, Crowe, Burchett in an attempt to make a personal appeal for support.
It turned out, however, that his relationship with these Republicans was not personal but political. They did not go against “principle” to vote with Ramsey anymore than they did when they went with him.
In fact, if there is to be charges of partisanship, if by partisanship one means putting party before principle, one could point just as easily to other side. While people accuse Rosalind Kurita, of playing Ron Ramsey’s lapdog in this vote, that charge is capricious when one considers that Kurita is the senate’s chief populist when it comes to “democratizing” offices.
She wants just about every office one can think of voted on by the people, one could not imagine her feelings would be different on the subject of judges.
Senators Jim Kyle and Doug Henry, however, voted against implementation of the Tennessee Plan in 1994. One would expect, at least in Henry’s case, he did so based on his strict constitutionalism, what changed this time?
Was it partisan politics that lead these Democrats who voted against the plan then to embrace it now? Was it personal?
Or was it, just as Brewer suggests, just politics?
Senate Bigwigs Back down From Quid Pro Quo On Open Government
Posted on April 23, 2008 at 10:48 amJohn Rodgers reports on big open government news this morning out the Senate Finance Committee. It appears that the quest for a quid pro quo from open government groups has been abandoned:
The Senate Finance Committee gave its unanimous approval this morning to the first major change to the state’s open records law in 25 years, sending the measure to the Senate floor.
The Finance Committee approved the bill after Senate Democratic Leader Jim Kyle of Memphis backed away from a move to require good government groups involved in the open records bill to disclose where they received their funding.
See the bill here and Rodgers explanation of the differences between the Senate and House versions here.




Recent Comments
I don’t think the comparison to universal pre-K is...
Oh, good … the discredited Bush “Yes...
I am far more concerned about McDaniel’s impact as Caucus...
“Where is Jesus in any of that?” Ummm…...
It is a little hard to follow someone on Twitter who...
Well, at least he said “We.” I accept Mr. Wamp’s apology.
I think we were officially in a recession right about the time that people started...
As Oatney’s head explodes in 3..2..1…. Welcome to the...
Nashvillian Ken Marrero, the Blue Collar Muse is also...
If they leave federal matching money on the table, and their ideology...