feed icon

Davis’ Big Payback Probably Not What He Was Expecting

Posted on June 18, 2008 at 11:16 am

Jeff Woods points out the one important point we have learned from the whole Democratic State Executive Committeeman’s “I heard on Fox News that Barack Obama may have terrorist connections” flap — Rep. Lincoln Davis and Harold Ford, Jr. aren’t as big a fans of each other as they used to be:

If we needed proof, this whole episode confirms that Davis and Harold Ford Jr. are really pissed at each other. The rub is that Junior is refusing to help anoint Davis as the 2010 gubernatorial nominee. As Davis said this week, “God bless Harold Ford Jr. Bless his little heart.”

Indeed. From a political perspective, one can almost say Junior is in the wrong here. Lincoln Davis, of the extremely rural conservative Fourth District, did a fair bit of vouching for Harold Ford, Jr. during the 2006 Senate race.

To be sure, Ford played the populist to a tee and went the places he needed to go to secure his good ole boy chops and assuage the fears of white Democrats and independents that he wasn’t like those “other Fords out of Memphis.”

But having a silver haired good ole Southern yellow dog Democrat standing next to him while he visited Confederate flag emblazoned diners and talked the Southern Populist palaver probably didn’t hurt ‘em any.

While in the days of old, the “I’ll scratch your back, if you scratch mine” quid pro quo was more explicit, to say that Lincoln Davis didn’t think he was banking a bit of love with Ford for giving him credibility with yellow dog dems would be naive.

Davis expect a return on investment. What did Davis get for his troubles? Not much it seems. While Lincoln vouched for Ford with rural whites going so far as loaning out his Chief of Staff to serve as campaign manager, when the wormed turned and Davis and his staff found themselves in a racial beef, not only did Ford not help Davis out, he threw his man to the wolves.

Now, one can say that this was just business. Ford was implicitly, but not explicitly behind Hillary Clinton in the most recent primaries, and this episode probably seemed like a good way to get in good with the new king of the Democratic Party.

But Ford’s statement does strike one as a bit of overkill. After all, despite the chronology implications in some articles Lincoln Davis’s Chief of Staff’s disavowal of the views attributed to him in the City Paper occurred before the Ford statement throwing him under the bus.

So considering what Lincoln Davis did for the almost successful Senate campaign of Harold Ford, Jr. it is understandable that Davis is a bit perturbed that Ford has not taken steps to return the favor, instead taking action that one could reasonably interpret as outright sabotage.

SEE ALSO: Braisted points out that this subterranean Ford/Davis feud is not new and recounts the acrimony between the two camps when various Ford operatives were talking up a Ford Gubernatorial run last Fall.

The Committee Gets An Apology: Fred Hobbs Puts Pen To Paper

Posted on June 16, 2008 at 4:57 pm

Sean Braisted with the breaker. Fred Hobbs, the Tennessee Democratic Party  state executive committee member who started a blogstorm over comments he made to the City Paper alleging Barack Obama may have terrorist connections, has apologized:

I was not as well prepared as I should have been when speaking with reporters, and I should have taken more time to research Senator Obama’s positions. My comments did reflect questions I had after what I had seen reported on Fox News, but I should have taken some time to check the accuracy of what I saw on television before speaking publicly. My statement that Senator Obama “may be terrorist-connected” was incorrect, and I apologize for making it.

Hobbs had been reported to have apologized both by the Huffington Post and by Gray Sasser since his remarks caused the firestorm on Friday. A Tennessean article seemed to cause confusion the point. This statement would seem now clarify the position of Mr. Hobbs.

Today, the Chattanoogan reported that Fred Hobbs is a close political associate to Congressman Lincoln Davis, the Democratic superdelegate whose refusal to endorse the Democratic nominee, started the line of inquiry into Obama’s perception amongst rural Democrats.

Davis’ Chief of Staff, Beecher Frasier, refused to distance himself initially from the Hobbs comments only to clear up the confusion some six hours later. Jackson Baker asserts that this whole episode has left Davis quite dirty in the lead up to his Gubernatorial run.

Has it? Or will it depend on whether Obama does in fact win the Presidency? For if he doesn’t, will not Davis’ lack of enthusiasm seem prescient and bank him love down the road?

SEE ALSO:
Bill Hobbs
Daily Kos
Lawrence County Commish Chris Jackson Rebukes Hobbs

Harold Ford, Jr. Throws Former Campaign Manager Under The Bus

Posted on June 14, 2008 at 9:59 am

It was a long curious day for the Tennessee Democratic party yesterday. Divisions in the party were exacerbated when John Rodgers of the Nashville City Paper reported the words of Tennessee Democratic Party state executive committee member Fred Hobbs on Barack Obama:

“I don’t exactly approve of a lot of the things he stands for and I’m not sure we know enough about him,” Hobbs said when asked why he thought Davis wasn’t endorsing Obama. “He’s got some bad connections, and he may be terrorist connected for all I can tell. It sounds kind of like he may be.”

Adding insult to injury, Beecher Frasier, Chief of Staff to Democratic Congressman Lincoln Davis of Tennessee’s rural and conservative 4th District, was portrayed in the same article as saying he didn’t know for sure if Obama was “terrorist connected” but assumes he’s not.

The Tennessee Democratic Party almost immediately sent out a release rebuking Hobbs. Beecher Frasier, later in the day, released a statement setting the record straight asserting that “no one in their right mind, including me, believes Senator Obama has ties to terrorism.”

The state executive committeeman Fred Hobbs then, as reported by the Huffington Post, apologized for the comments and confirmed that he would be voting for Senator Obama in the fall.

However, at least one prominent Tennessee Democrat with a history with Beecher Frasier wishes to make clear his associations with the man. Late last night, NashvillePost.com received the following statement from Harold Ford, Jr.

Let me be clear about 2 things

First, Beecher Frasier is dead wrong. Senator Obama is a Christian, American patriot with a vision to make America safer and stronger. I am going to join millions of Tennesseans and Americans by working this year this to bring life to that vision by electing Barack Obama President of the United States.

Second, Beecher’s past association with me is just that - past. I’ve had no relationship with him since 2006. I don’t want a relationship with him, or anyone else who says these things. His comments offend me as an American and embarrass me as a Tennessean.

In 2006, Beecher Frasier took a leave of absence from the staff of Rep. Lincoln Davis to work for Harold Ford, Jr. as his campaign manager in his bid for U.S. Senate.

Rep. Lincoln Davis was very supportive of Harold Ford, Jr.’s run for Senate so these comments have to come with their own special sting for those close to both men.

SEE ALSO:
Brainstem’s impressions
Sadcox
Bill Hobbs
Music City Oracle
Red State
Silence

TNDP State Executive Committeeman Makes Fox News

Posted on at 2:51 am

The Tennessee Democratic Party makes national news for one of its State Executive Committee members comments suggesting Barack Obama has connections to terrorists. Connections, ironically, he says he learned of from watching the very news outlet now giving his comments press:

PREVIOUSLY:
Beecher Frasier Speaks On Barack Obama’s Connection To Terror
Davis Chief Of Staff “Assumes” Obama Not Terrorist Connected

Another Democratic State Executive Committee Member Speaks Out

Posted on at 2:42 am

Sean Braisted shares a comment from another Democratic State Executive Committee member who does not share the views of one her counterparts who made news yesterday for comments suggesting Barack Obama has connections to terrorist organizations:

I in no way agree with Mr. [Fred] Hobbs on his statements in the Nashville City paper. I am disappointed that he so foolishly made those comments and even more so that he feels that way. I am equally disappointed in Beecher Frasier for not adamantly speaking against what Fred said about Sen. Obama. I am a “Yellow Dog Democrat” and will always support the party nominee. I attended the unity breakfast with Chairman Sasser and Gov. Bredesen the day they announced their support for Obama. I look forward to campaigning as hard for Sen. Obama as I did for Sen. Clinton in the primary.

Congressman Bart Gordon Gets In On Beechergate

Posted on June 13, 2008 at 6:23 pm

The only other undeclared superdelegate, Congressman Bart Gordon, weighs in on the controversy regarding a Tennessee Democrat’s suggestion that Barack Obama may have terrorist connections:

Gordon spokeswoman Julie Eubank said the congressman supports his party’s nominee.

“Congressman Gordon believes these accusations are ridiculous,” she said in a statement. “Both parties should refrain from absurd personal attacks that detract from a substantive debate about the future of our country.”

Davis Opponent Wants The Inside Scoop On Obama’s Terrorist Connections

Posted on at 4:49 pm

The City Paper is holding to its story that Congressman Lincoln Davis’ Chief Of Staff Beecher Frasier failed to unequivocally assert that Barack Obama had no connection to terror. Frasier, for his part, has released an unequivocal statement. Monty Lankford, however, one of Davis’s Republican opponents, doesn’t want the fun to stop:

“If Lincoln Davis believes there is a chance Barack Obama is ‘terrorist-connected,’ that may explain why he has dragged his feet in not endorsing Obama,” Lankford said. “And if so, Davis needs to share his Washington ‘insider information’ with the rest of us in Tennessee.”

Beecher Frasier Speaks On Barack Obama’s Connection To Terror, City Paper Reacts

Posted on at 3:06 pm

From the man himself:

No one in their right mind, including me, believes Senator Obama has ties to terrorism. It is truly ridiculous for anyone to try to make hay out of these comments.”

The City Paper’s Brewer and Rodgers react:

City Paper reporter Rodgers and editor Brewer are adamant. Brewer said he and Rodgers “stand by this story,” certain that the tone of Frasier’s comments was portrayed accurately.

SEE ALSO: Ilissa Gold sorts through it all.

PREVIOUSLY:
Davis Chief Of Staff “Assumes” Obama Not Terrorist Connected
Did Beecher Frasier Throw The Liberal Wing Under The Bus?
Beecher’s Pass
Huffington Post

Beecher Frasier’s Tullahoma Terrorist Fistjab Makes Huffington Post

Posted on at 2:53 pm

Dawn Teo on the continuing controversy:

When I called Davis’s congressional office this morning, his staff said that he had not yet spoken with them regarding the matter. They were unable to make any statement or comment. According to the congressman’s McMinnville office in Warren County, Davis is presently on the road doing “county visits.”

Davis Chief of Staff Beecher Frasier attempted to clear up the matter but only added fuel to the fire. City Paper’s Rodgers asked point blank whether he, Beecher Frasier, believed Obama had ties to terrorists. Frasier responded saying that he “didn’t know for sure” whether Obama was “terrorist connected” but that he assumed not.

Tennessee Democratic Party Communications Director Wade Munday issued an official response, blaming the statements and the sentiments behind them on Republican efforts “to turn internet smears and highly offensive gossip into the [Republican] message against Senator Barack Obama.” Munday’s release assures readers that the Democratic Party of Tennessee is united behind the party nominee. The Democratic Party office told me that Fred Hobbs had apologized and would be voting for Obama.

Clint Brewer, the editor of City Paper, was nevertheless clearly vexed that Davis would not issue a formal response on the comments made by Chief of Staff Frasier. After all, three ranking figures in local Democratic politics had given voice to concerns widespread in the area.

TNGOP Reacts To The Tullahoma Terrorist Fistjab

Posted on at 2:07 pm

From a TNGOP release:

Cracks are showing in the Tennessee Democrat Party’s claim of being unified behind their presidential nominee, Barack Obama, this week with the revelation that TDP State Executive Committee member Fred Hobbs has said publicly that he believes Obama “may be terrorist connected.”

Fred Hobbs was quoted in the Nashville City Paper saying this about Obama:

“He’s got some bad connections, and he may be terrorist connected for all I can tell. It sounds kind of like he may be.”

Echoing Hobbs’ comments, Beecher Frasier, chief of staff for Tennessee Democrat U.S. Rep. Lincoln Davis, a superdelegate to the Democratic National Convention, “said he doesn’t know for sure if Obama is ‘terrorist connected’ but he assumes he’s not,” the City Paper reported.

Rep. Davis has refused to endorse Barack Obama. Democrat voters in Davis’ congressional district - typical rural often God-fearing and gun-owning moderate Democrats - went overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton in the Feb. 5 presidential primary rather than for Obama, the choice of the party’s urban liberal elitists.

“The Tennessee Democrat Party has a long history of making unfounded accusations calling political rivals racists and smear artists,” said Tennessee Republican Party communications director Bill Hobbs (no relation to TDP party leader Fred Hobbs.)

“Perhaps before they fire the “racism” charge at others or claim their own party is unified behind Barack Obama, they might want to explain to the Obama campaign why one of the leaders of the Tennessee DemocratParty is accusing Obama of having terrorist connections, and why a Democrat Tennessee congressman and superdelegate is refusing to endorse the party’s presidential nominee,” TRP spokesman Hobbs said.

While the TDP deals with its internal split over whether or not to support Barack Obama, the Tennessee Republican Party notes that the majority of Tennessee Democrats didn’t back Obama in the February primary – and invites them to consider voting for the Republican nominee this fall.

“For Tennesseans who want to keep their hard-earned paycheck rather than see their wages go to pay for a bloated government, for those who don’t want to appease terrorists but see the war in Iraq come to an end in victory and for those who want health care access increased but not at the sacrifice of losing their personal choice of a physician, there is only one choice, and it isn’t Barack Obama,” said Robin Smith, chairman of the Tennessee Republican party.

PREVIOUSLY:
Why Does Beecher Get A Pass?
Did Beecher Frasier Throw The Liberal Wing Under The Bus?
Davis Chief Of Staff “Assumes” Obama Not Terrorist Connected, Can’t Be Sure

Tullahoma Terrorist Fistjab III: Why Does Beecher Get A Pass?

Posted on at 12:12 pm

The Tennessee Democratic Party in their statement addressing the implication of terrorist ties to Barack Obama seem to throw state Democratic executive member Fred Hobbs under the bus, while Lincoln Davis Chief of Staff Beecher Frasier gets a pass even though, according to the article, Frasier would not complete disavow the statement made by Hobbs.

Question: Why does the state executive committee member draw the ire of the State Dems and not Frasier?

Wade Munday, spokesman for the state Democratic party, tells Post Politics that Frasier was not addressed in the statement because the wording of the article. Although the City Paper frames Frasier’s comments a certain way only the words “terrorist connected” are actually in quotes:

“It appears that the comments of Beecher Fraiser were not directly quoted as were the comments attributed to Mr. Hobbs.”

So until Beecher Frasier clarifies his statement it seems there will be no rebuke from the party.

The Tullahoma Terrorist Fistjab Con’t: Did Beecher Fraiser Throw The Liberal Wing Under The Bus?

Posted on at 11:39 am

The comments of Beecher Frasier, Chief of Staff to Congressman Lincoln Davis, in the Nashville City Paper where he was reluctant to completely dismiss the possibility that Barack Obama has terrorist connections has raised the ire of the netroots. A blogger at Daily Kos suggests that Frasier’s stance is a deliberate political ploy designed to throw a progressive candidate to the wolves to enhance his bosses conservative street cred:

One thing to know about Beecher Frasier. In 2005, he conducted a smear campaign against the Democracy for America organization in Tennessee, saying that they and Howard Dean were a threat to the Democratic Party. Frasier tried, unsuccessfully, to accuse DFA members from going on local radio shows in East Tennessee to talk down his boss, Congressman Davis. When Frasier brought his accusations to the state party Chairman, Bob Tuke (now running for U.S. Senate), Tuke investigated Frasier’s claims and found them to be complete lies. It should be noted, too, that Beecher Frasier was a key figure in Harold Ford Jr.’s campaign for Senate in 2006. Insiders say that Frasier repeatedly advised Ford to run to the right and throw the liberal wing of the Party under the bus. You’ll remember that Ford lost very narrowly - possibly because of this strategy - making Tennessee the only Democratic Senate seat that the Party lost in ‘06.

Remember. Lincoln Davis is planning on running for Governor of Tennessee in 2010. Beecher Frasier will almost certainly be his campaign manager and if Davis wins, he’ll be a key advisor - if not the Chief of Staff or Deputy Governor - in a Davis administration. Do we want a know-nothing loser who uses Republican talking points to attack the presidential nominee to have such a strong influence on Tennessee’s possible future Governor?

The blogosphere is wild and woolly on this one and will likely remain so until a clarifying statement is released.

Tullahoma Terrorist Fistjab: Davis Chief Of Staff “Assumes” Obama Not Terrorist Connected, Can’t Be Sure

Posted on at 9:49 am

Both Bill Hobbs and Sean Braisted note an interesting few graphs in an article about Congressman Lincoln Davis’s refusal to endorse Barack Obama, despite being a Edwards supporter earlier in the cycle:

Fred Hobbs, a state Democratic Party Executive Committee member representing part of Davis’ district, said he understands why Davis is not endorsing Obama and is “skeptical” of the Illinois senator himself.

“Maybe [it’s] the same reason I don’t want to — I don’t exactly approve of a lot of the things he stands for and I’m not sure we know enough about him,” Hobbs said when asked why he thought Davis wasn’t endorsing Obama. “He’s got some bad connections, and he may be terrorist connected for all I can tell. It sounds kind of like he may be.”

Davis was not made available for comment.

His chief of staff, Beecher Frasier, said he doesn’t know for sure if Obama is “terrorist connected” but he assumes he’s not.

The Tennessee Democratic Party releases a statement in rebuke of their state Executive committee member:

“The Tennessee Democratic Party is united behind our party’s nominee, Senator Barack Obama. Mr. [Fred] Hobbs is obviously misinformed, and his statement highlights the perpetual efforts of the Republican Party, especially here in Tennessee, to turn internet smears and highly offensive gossip into their party’s message against Senator Barack Obama as we head into the General Election. Instead of debating the issues, the Tennessee Republican Party continues to rely upon slanderous and salacious tall tales. They are borrowing from the playbook first written by Richard Nixon and employed in the race against Congressman Harold Ford Jr. Tennesseans of every political persuasion are tired of these tactics.”

SEE ALSO:
A Pith Pulle
R. Neal reacts
Progressive Nashville
The Flypaper Theory
Tiny Cat Pants
Coble
Daily Kos
The Politico’s Jonathan Martin
Say Uncle
Mad Wombat
Michael Silence
Tennessee Ticket
Huffington Post
Cecily Friday
David Oatney
Newscoma

The Collective

The Latest from NashvillePost.com

Archives