feed icon

Democratic U.S. Senate Candidate Denied The Right To Speak

Posted on July 22, 2008 at 12:20 pm

Tom Yancey reports on the treatment of Lenny Ladner at a meeting of the Northeast Democrats:

At the end of the meeting, one man seated on the second row asked for time. The man turned out to be Leonard “Lenny” Ladner, a Democratic candidate who is also on the ballot for the Senate nomination.

Light declined to give Ladner time, not even 10 seconds, so Ladner began speaking anyway, in a loud, apparently agitated voice.

Ladner angrily asked Light why he, a candidate who spent $500 to travel to Greeneville, was not allowed to speak.

He then asked the candidates, “Why is it all your solutions” involve large amounts of spending and the growth of government?

He then asked Light “Why not let a working-class person speak?” Ladner is a long-haul truck driver.

Light answered, “I don’t want to,” without elaborating, causing Ladner to turn to the audience and say, “You all heard that.”

Ladner then walked out of the meeting. Several in the audience said Ladner later apologized to candidate Tuke in the parking lot.

After the meeting, Light told The Greeneville Sun that he decided not to include Ladner because polls showed him having little chance. Light also said others who had heard Ladner speak advised him against it.

(via Demarcationville)

Comments

One Responses to “Democratic U.S. Senate Candidate Denied The Right To Speak”

  1. joe lance writes
    July 23rd, 2008 8:00 am

    Better to let a man open his mouth and prove that he is a fool, than to make him keep it shut and leave everyone wondering.

    Or, something like that. Obviously, I am not calling Mr. Ladner a fool, but making a point.

    Voters can decide whether they like the way a candidate speaks, or if they agree with where a candidate stands. There are a few perennial “gadfly” candidates in my area, and I have witnessed the attempts by the political establishment to silence them. When they do get a chance to be heard, the discomfort on the dais is palpable.

    Look. I’m a discerning voter (or I fancy myself one), so I am not very likely to vote for an inexperienced, less educated, chip-on-the-shoulder candidate (again, I haven’t met Ladner; I’m talking about people whom I have seen), but if one qualifies for electoral consideration, then that candidate should be included in any public forum in which he or she wishes to participate. Otherwise, the “he can’t win” argument comes off as a corrupt self-fulfilling prophecy.

Leave a Reply




Recent Comments

The Collective

The Latest from NashvillePost.com

Archives